H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jonathan Canter vs Raul Antonio Viver H2H: 0-1
Raul Antonio Viver holds a 1–0 lead over Jonathan Canter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raul Antonio Viver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Raul Antonio Viver won the 1985 Buenos Aires third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 65
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1985* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Raul Antonio Viver | 6-3 6-1 | Jonathan Canter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Raul Antonio Viver | #957 | #94 | 267 | 1,566 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonathan Canter | Raul Antonio Viver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #300 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #260 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |