H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jonathan Canter vs Roberto Arguello H2H: 1-0
Jonathan Canter holds a 1–0 lead over Roberto Arguello in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jonathan Canter leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1986 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jonathan Canter | 6-3 6-3 6-3 | Roberto Arguello | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Roberto Arguello | #829 | #38 | 144 | 1,718 | 60 | 82 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonathan Canter | Roberto Arguello | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #50 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #231 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #177 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #177 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #190 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #217 | 1,465 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |