H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jonathan Canter vs Tim Mayotte H2H: 1-1
Jonathan Canter and Tim Mayotte are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Mayotte leads 1–0 on grass, while Jonathan Canter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1986 US Open first round 6-7 4-6 7-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1986* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jonathan Canter | 6-7 4-6 7-6 6-1 6-3 | Tim Mayotte | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Tim Mayotte | 7-5 6-4 7-6 | Jonathan Canter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tim Mayotte | #1,103 | #7 | 1,274 | 2,047 | 333 | 194 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonathan Canter | Tim Mayotte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #16 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #44 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #12 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #9 | 1,981 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #10 | 1,909 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #13 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #37 | 1,745 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #115 | 1,716 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,698 | 0 | 12 |