H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jonathan Canter vs Ulf Stenlund H2H: 0-1

Ulf Stenlund holds a 1–0 lead over Jonathan Canter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ulf Stenlund leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ulf Stenlund won the 1987 Wimbledon round of 128 6-7 6-3 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jonathan Canter
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Ulf Stenlund
SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ulf Stenlund #25 6-7 6-3 6-4 6-4 Jonathan Canter #54 Match data Jun 24, 1987* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jonathan Canter #810 #36 244 1,794 68 96 41.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ulf Stenlund #901 #23 153 1,813 52 44 54.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jonathan Canter Ulf Stenlund
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 3–5 37.5% — 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 2–5 28.6% #279 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 0–5 0.0% #225 1,464 0 0 1986 20–12 62.5% #34 1,697 0 1
20 1985 16–14 53.3% #73 1,637 0 1 1987 24–19 55.8% #43 1,681 0 1
21 1986 27–22 55.1% #41 1,733 0 1 1988 6–11 35.3% #246 1,616 0 1
22 1987 5–17 22.7% #169 1,601 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1988 2–4 33.3% #182 1,584 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1989 6–13 31.6% #183 1,533 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1990 5–5 50.0% #191 1,559 0 1 1992 0–1 0.0% #301 1,605 0 1
26 1991 0–2 0.0% #408 1,539 0 1 1993 2–1 66.7% #312 1,635 0 1
28 1993 2–1 66.7% #190 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1994 0–3 0.0% #388 1,543 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jonathan Canter Ulf Stenlund
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1985 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1986 19 11 30 63.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1988 — — — — 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1987 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
28 1993 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 47 52 99 47.5% 3 11 14 21.4% 9 15 24 37.5% 9 18 27 33.3% — 7 8 15 46.7% 41 29 70 58.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jonathan Canter Ulf Stenlund
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.7% 59.1% 45.8% 16.7% 60.0% 54.4% 37.3%
26 1991 2/2 1.0 1.5 58.9% 72.4% 42.1% 47.2% 12.5% 59.9% 30.4% 1993 3/3 0.3 1.0 85.9% 57.9% 46.1% 66.7% 81.7% 56.7% 44.1%
28 1993 3/3 2.3 2.3 48.7% 73.3% 56.6% 45.0% 36.2% 64.8% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 3/3 4.3 2.0 54.3% 63.2% 43.6% 56.1% 31.0% 54.5% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 8/164 2.8 2.0 53.4% 69.3% 48.1% 49.7% 28.3% 59.7% 35.8% — 4/96 0.5 1.3 80.6% 58.2% 46.0% 54.2% 76.3% 56.1% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jonathan Canter Ulf Stenlund
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1506 102.0 — — — — +34 — — 26.7% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1513 105.9 — — — — +20 — — 27.8% -1.39 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1464 104.0 — — — — +10 — — 15.4% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.25 1986 1698 135.3 — — — — -187 +80 — 60.0% +0.55 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.34
20 1985 1637 124.4 — — — — -52 — +5 55.3% +0.49 2–7 (22%) 5–5 (50%) — +2.25 1987 1682 138.6 — — — — -54 +27 — 53.4% +0.38 10–9 (53%) 7–10 (41%) — +0.31
21 1986 1734 139.0 — — — — +15 -236 -104 54.3% +0.18 11–11 (50%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.70 1988 1617 127.1 — — — — — +50 — 40.9% -0.80 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -1.15
22 1987 1602 135.3 — — — — +44 -90 — 31.1% -1.15 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1988 1584 107.3 — — — — +48 — — 31.3% -1.06 1–0 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 1533 119.1 — — — — +51 — -31 42.6% -0.20 0–7 (0%) 1–7 (13%) — +0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 1559 113.9 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.61 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.78 1992 1606 104.7 +0.66 -3.36 0.818 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00
26 1991 1540 106.6 -0.46 +0.70 0.758 45.5% — — — 16.7% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.20 1993 1636 115.1 -1.60 +2.39 1.018 50.8% — +65 — 66.7% +1.50 — — — +0.18
28 1993 1580 116.6 +0.08 +1.04 1.103 51.6% +20 — — 62.5% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1543 103.5 -1.08 -0.13 0.796 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.29 — 0–2 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1794 132.1 -0.49 +0.52 0.887 48.0% +18 -163 -19 44.1% -0.29 23–37 (38%) 21–34 (38%) 88.2 +2.44 — 1813 138.5 -1.04 +0.95 0.966 49.6% -87 +53 — 53.3% +0.24 18–18 (50%) 11–14 (44%) 101.1 +0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.