H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jonathan Stark vs Grant Connell H2H: 1-0
Jonathan Stark holds a 1–0 lead over Grant Connell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jonathan Stark leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jonathan Stark won the 1992 Tokyo Indoor second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1992* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Jonathan Stark | 6-3 6-4 | Grant Connell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Grant Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonathan Stark | Grant Connell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |