H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jonathan Stark vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 2-1
Jonathan Stark holds a 2–1 lead over Jacco Eltingh in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jonathan Stark leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jacco Eltingh leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jonathan Stark won the 1996 Miami Masters first round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1996* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jonathan Stark | 6-2 7-5 | Jacco Eltingh | Match data |
| Oct 15, 1994* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Jacco Eltingh | 6-2 7-6(1) | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1994* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jonathan Stark | 6-2 6-4 | Jacco Eltingh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jacco Eltingh | #1,378 | #19 | 1,332 | 1,874 | 124 | 140 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonathan Stark | Jacco Eltingh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #128 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #78 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #63 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #23 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #43 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #307 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #604 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |