H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jonathan Stark vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-1
Jonathan Stark and Justin Gimelstob are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Justin Gimelstob leads 1–0 on grass, while Jonathan Stark leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justin Gimelstob won the 1999 Halle third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1999* | Halle | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Justin Gimelstob | 6-3 6-4 | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
| Aug 1, 1996* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jonathan Stark | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonathan Stark | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |