H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jonathan Stark vs Tommy Ho H2H: 2-0
Jonathan Stark holds a 2–0 lead over Tommy Ho in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jonathan Stark leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Stark won the 1994 Tokyo Indoor fourth round 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1994* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jonathan Stark | 6-4 7-6(3) | Tommy Ho | Match data |
| Jan 19, 1994* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jonathan Stark | 7-5 6-7(3) 7-6(1) 6-3 | Tommy Ho | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tommy Ho | #1,306 | #85 | 522 | 1,622 | 36 | 66 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jonathan Stark | Tommy Ho | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #625 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #641 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #127 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #482 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #250 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |