H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 13:16 UTC
Jordan Thompson vs Bernard Tomic H2H: 0-1
Bernard Tomic holds a 1–0 lead over Jordan Thompson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernard Tomic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2016 Sydney fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Bernard Tomic | 6-2 6-2 | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Thompson | #309 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jordan Thompson | Bernard Tomic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |