H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Jordan Thompson vs Jerzy Janowicz H2H: 0-1
Jerzy Janowicz holds a 1–0 lead over Jordan Thompson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jerzy Janowicz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jerzy Janowicz won the 2014 Australian Open first round 1-6 4-6 6-4 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jerzy Janowicz | 1-6 4-6 6-4 6-2 6-1 | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Thompson | #309 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jerzy Janowicz | #735 | #14 | 2,154 | 1,962 | 80 | 84 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jordan Thompson | Jerzy Janowicz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #26 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #21 | 1,913 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,849 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |