H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jordan Thompson vs John Isner H2H: 2-3

John Isner holds a 3–2 lead over Jordan Thompson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while John Isner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jordan Thompson won the 2023 Cincinnati Open first round 7-6(5) 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jordan Thompson
Australia Age 32 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jordan Thompson #55 7-6(5) 7-6(2) John Isner #106 Match data Aug 15, 2023* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jordan Thompson #63 7-6(2) 6-7(3) 6-3 John Isner #18 Match data Feb 14, 2020* R16 Dallas Open ATP 250 Hard
John Isner #15 3-6 6-3 7-6(6) Jordan Thompson #46 Match data Aug 7, 2019* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
John Isner #9 6-4 6-1 Jordan Thompson #60 Match data Feb 16, 2019* QF Dallas Open ATP 250 Hard
John Isner #22 6-3 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 Jordan Thompson #92 Match data May 30, 2017* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jordan Thompson #334 #26 1,745 1,944 150 173 46.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,068 470 294 61.5% 0 1 0 0 15 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jordan Thompson John Isner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2014 0–1 0.0% #276 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2015 0–1 0.0% #154 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2016 3–10 23.1% #79 1,493 0 0 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0
23 2017 10–16 38.5% #94 1,673 0 0 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,607 0 0
24 2018 1–10 9.1% #72 1,549 0 0 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,829 0 0
25 2019 26–22 54.2% #63 1,765 0 0 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,884 0 1
26 2020 10–12 45.5% #51 1,758 0 0 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,020 0 3
27 2021 21–21 50.0% #75 1,692 0 0 2012 41–19 68.3% #14 1,977 0 5
28 2022 10–17 37.0% #84 1,687 0 0 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,984 0 7
29 2023 19–22 46.3% #55 1,761 0 0 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,935 0 9
30 2024 36–24 60.0% #26 1,916 0 1 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,028 0 10
31 2025 13–16 44.8% #108 1,795 0 1 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,021 0 10
32 2026 1–1 50.0% #334 1,786 0 1 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,985 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,958 0 14
34 — — — — — — — 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,922 0 15
35 — — — — — — — 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,945 0 16
37 — — — — — — — 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,925 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,711 0 16

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jordan Thompson John Isner
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2007 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2017 7 10 17 41.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2008 9 12 21 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 2018 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2009 25 17 42 59.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2019 16 15 31 51.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 2010 29 13 42 69.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2020 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 26 13 39 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 1 7 85.7%
27 2021 10 11 21 47.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 2012 27 12 39 69.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 2 10 80.0%
28 2022 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2013 26 14 40 65.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 2023 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2014 27 14 41 65.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2024 29 16 45 64.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2015 31 14 45 68.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
31 2025 7 9 16 43.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2016 22 13 35 62.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
32 2026 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 23 14 37 62.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 20 16 36 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 1 6 83.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 24 16 40 60.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 18 8 26 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 11 10 21 52.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 6 10 16 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
Career — 99 109 208 47.6% 16 32 48 33.3% 35 32 67 52.2% — 341 206 547 62.3% 75 59 134 56.0% 54 29 83 65.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 319/323 of Jordan Thompson's and 756/764 of John Isner's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jordan Thompson John Isner
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2014 1/1 13.0 7.0 60.3% 72.2% 42.3% 44.4% 30.0% 60.3% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 1/1 4.0 10.0 55.4% 63.9% 50.0% 76.5% 25.0% 57.7% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 12/13 6.1 2.9 57.2% 74.6% 51.4% 51.0% 36.2% 64.5% 33.3% 2007 13/13 19.6 3.1 67.2% 78.2% 59.4% 65.5% 19.8% 71.9% 26.6%
23 2017 26/26 6.4 2.8 60.5% 68.8% 45.7% 52.9% 36.0% 59.8% 36.6% 2008 29/30 15.0 3.4 66.9% 77.1% 52.3% 60.0% 26.1% 68.8% 27.4%
24 2018 11/11 5.2 3.6 67.4% 63.5% 40.0% 54.6% 33.9% 56.6% 34.9% 2009 45/45 14.5 2.5 67.1% 75.0% 57.4% 65.9% 29.5% 69.1% 30.0%
25 2019 48/48 6.2 1.9 66.8% 71.7% 51.4% 63.7% 44.3% 64.8% 36.1% 2010 58/58 17.8 2.3 69.1% 76.5% 55.9% 68.0% 39.3% 70.1% 29.9%
26 2020 22/22 5.2 2.0 63.3% 69.6% 49.4% 61.2% 31.2% 62.0% 34.0% 2011 53/53 15.2 2.8 69.2% 78.0% 55.6% 62.5% 40.1% 71.2% 31.5%
27 2021 42/42 7.4 2.0 58.3% 72.4% 50.2% 54.8% 35.1% 63.1% 34.8% 2012 56/60 16.7 2.2 67.9% 78.2% 57.0% 72.2% 33.2% 71.6% 31.1%
28 2022 27/27 7.0 1.8 64.3% 70.7% 46.3% 57.8% 40.2% 62.1% 32.9% 2013 60/60 16.3 1.7 67.7% 79.4% 57.8% 66.5% 33.7% 72.2% 31.1%
29 2023 41/41 8.3 1.2 59.8% 75.1% 57.5% 60.6% 34.9% 67.8% 35.5% 2014 57/58 17.4 1.8 67.8% 79.1% 57.8% 73.0% 27.3% 72.1% 30.2%
30 2024 58/60 6.7 1.2 59.9% 73.0% 54.3% 62.9% 40.0% 65.3% 36.6% 2015 68/68 18.5 1.8 70.3% 80.2% 58.6% 74.8% 37.5% 73.8% 29.6%
31 2025 28/29 8.0 1.9 59.8% 71.0% 53.9% 52.3% 29.3% 64.1% 31.1% 2016 50/50 23.2 2.7 69.2% 82.4% 55.3% 68.3% 35.9% 73.9% 30.7%
32 2026 2/2 11.0 1.0 58.0% 71.0% 61.0% 57.0% 44.5% 67.0% 36.0% 2017 57/57 19.7 2.2 70.6% 80.6% 56.5% 63.6% 41.2% 73.5% 29.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 54/54 22.4 2.4 69.1% 81.3% 56.7% 70.1% 30.6% 73.7% 29.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 46/46 21.8 1.7 71.0% 81.4% 58.6% 70.1% 34.2% 74.7% 29.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 17/17 21.9 3.5 71.5% 78.6% 54.9% 84.1% 25.0% 72.2% 28.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 33/34 20.6 2.1 68.5% 79.0% 55.9% 62.7% 34.5% 71.8% 28.4%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 37/38 22.6 2.8 68.8% 80.3% 54.1% 64.9% 36.6% 72.1% 27.7%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 23/23 20.9 2.9 67.7% 79.7% 57.4% 72.2% 18.8% 72.3% 28.0%
Career — 319/323 6.9 1.9 61.5% 71.7% 51.4% 58.6% 37.1% 63.8% 35.0% — 756/764 18.8 2.3 68.9% 79.2% 56.7% 68.4% 33.7% 72.2% 29.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jordan Thompson John Isner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2013 1500 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1486 102.5 -2.21 -0.55 0.949 47.8% — — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 1474 107.0 +0.43 -1.25 0.830 47.3% — — — 0.0% -1.67 — 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 1493 120.8 -0.49 -1.64 0.940 48.6% -2 — +60 31.4% -0.97 0–4 (0%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.16 2007 1656 138.0 +5.43 -3.75 0.947 49.4% +37 — — 54.1% -0.19 5–1 (83%) 12–7 (63%) — +0.01
23 2017 1673 144.0 -1.84 +0.04 0.910 48.4% -28 -100 -109 41.7% -0.36 6–5 (55%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.72 2008 1608 128.0 +4.14 -6.69 0.881 48.3% +39 -96 -116 41.0% -0.51 4–8 (33%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.16
24 2018 1549 111.8 -4.44 -1.25 0.804 45.8% +2 — +8 22.6% -1.58 0–2 0–4 (0%) — +0.27 2009 1830 145.6 +4.72 -4.63 0.972 50.0% +1 -280 — 57.0% +0.23 12–6 (67%) 26–12 (68%) — +0.93
25 2019 1766 146.6 -0.04 +0.74 1.024 50.7% -45 -141 -118 52.0% +0.33 11–9 (55%) 8–16 (33%) — +1.12 2010 1885 154.2 +5.86 -4.84 1.002 50.5% +41 -194 — 58.8% +0.34 19–9 (68%) 32–16 (67%) — +2.28
26 2020 1758 136.7 -0.96 -1.83 0.896 48.2% +7 -166 — 48.3% -0.23 4–4 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.01 2011 2020 160.4 +7.13 -3.98 1.097 51.5% +30 -361 -297 61.6% +0.53 11–11 (50%) 32–20 (62%) — +1.83
27 2021 1692 125.0 +0.01 -1.47 0.943 49.0% -26 -129 +61 46.7% -0.38 10–4 (71%) 14–8 (64%) — +1.58 2012 1978 157.8 +7.12 -4.36 1.092 51.3% +43 -260 -71 62.7% +0.43 15–10 (60%) 38–18 (68%) — +3.35
28 2022 1688 135.7 -1.27 -2.32 0.868 47.7% -9 -141 +44 41.1% -0.64 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.69 2013 1985 159.0 +7.64 -3.71 1.119 51.3% +52 -198 -94 59.5% +0.36 18–11 (62%) 36–17 (68%) — +3.48
29 2023 1761 146.9 +2.72 +0.27 1.102 51.0% -30 -293 +91 51.5% +0.10 4–10 (29%) 14–10 (58%) — +0.13 2014 1935 157.9 +7.20 -4.42 1.079 50.8% +50 -99 -27 61.8% +0.44 12–6 (67%) 41–21 (66%) — +3.24
30 2024 1916 153.5 +1.02 +1.46 1.052 50.8% +23 -420 -39 55.9% +0.07 12–6 (67%) 18–5 (78%) — -0.10 2015 2029 168.0 +8.71 -4.22 1.132 51.6% +54 -121 -120 62.7% +0.57 12–9 (57%) 39–25 (61%) — +3.80
31 2025 1795 131.8 -0.92 -2.39 0.868 47.5% +40 -280 +67 46.8% -0.47 6–5 (55%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.98 2016 2021 163.0 +8.76 -3.60 1.179 51.8% +44 -140 -79 58.6% +0.48 9–10 (47%) 31–30 (51%) — +1.41
32 2026 1787 106.8 +0.76 +0.01 1.091 50.5% — — — 50.0% +0.38 — 1–1 — +0.12 2017 1986 158.3 +8.00 -5.60 1.094 51.2% +14 -91 -60 60.0% +0.42 11–9 (55%) 40–24 (63%) — +3.24
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1959 158.8 +8.37 -4.32 1.129 51.3% -23 -61 +77 57.0% +0.42 14–11 (56%) 37–32 (54%) — +2.48
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1922 154.7 +8.16 -3.97 1.178 51.7% -6 — +115 61.2% +0.47 8–7 (53%) 29–23 (56%) — +3.19
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1846 134.4 +4.91 -4.34 1.035 50.7% +22 — — 60.9% +0.50 3–3 (50%) 14–7 (67%) — +1.74
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1945 152.3 +6.93 -5.43 1.006 50.2% 0 +9 — 62.5% +0.27 10–5 (67%) 21–9 (70%) — +0.90
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1926 145.5 +6.21 -5.79 0.996 49.8% -21 +13 +80 55.1% -0.02 11–8 (58%) 30–17 (64%) — +1.11
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1711 125.8 +5.40 -5.66 1.012 49.9% +36 — +244 45.3% -0.14 3–6 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +1.74
Career — 1945 146.1 -0.05 -0.42 0.967 49.3% -7 -216 +16 47.1% -0.23 57–56 (50%) 77–69 (53%) 107.3 +0.28 — 2068 162.0 +7.10 -4.58 1.071 50.9% +25 -137 -39 58.7% +0.34 177–130 (58%) 482–307 (61%) 111.1 +4.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.