H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Jordan Thompson vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 0-1
Kyle Edmund holds a 1–0 lead over Jordan Thompson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 6-4 6-2 | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Thompson | #308 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 173 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,001 | 114 | 121 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jordan Thompson | Kyle Edmund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #79 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,875 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,952 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #308 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |