H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Jordan Thompson vs Noah Rubin H2H: 1-0
Jordan Thompson holds a 1–0 lead over Noah Rubin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jordan Thompson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jordan Thompson won the 2019 New York third round 6-7(7) 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2019* | New York | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jordan Thompson | 6-7(7) 7-5 6-1 | Noah Rubin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Thompson | #308 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Noah Rubin | #1,126 | #125 | 456 | 1,692 | 8 | 21 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jordan Thompson | Noah Rubin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #604 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #250 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #308 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |