H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Jordan Thompson vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 0-1
Thomas Fabbiano holds a 1–0 lead over Jordan Thompson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Fabbiano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Fabbiano won the 2017 US Open second round 2-6 6-2 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Thomas Fabbiano | 2-6 6-2 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Thompson | #309 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Thomas Fabbiano | #1,768 | #70 | 715 | 1,748 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jordan Thompson | Thomas Fabbiano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #114 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |