H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jordan Thompson vs Vasek Pospisil H2H: 1-0
Jordan Thompson holds a 1–0 lead over Vasek Pospisil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jordan Thompson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jordan Thompson won the 2019 Chengdu third round 6-3 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 36
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2019* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jordan Thompson | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Vasek Pospisil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Thompson | #309 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Vasek Pospisil | #1,265 | #25 | 1,359 | 1,958 | 122 | 161 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jordan Thompson | Vasek Pospisil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #108 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #61 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #98 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #733 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1265 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |