H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Jorge Andrew vs Rod Laver H2H: 1-0
Jorge Andrew holds a 1–0 lead over Rod Laver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jorge Andrew leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jorge Andrew won the 1977 Queen's Club second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 74
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 87
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1977* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Jorge Andrew | 6-3 6-4 | Rod Laver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jorge Andrew | #831 | #66 | 0 | 1,621 | 36 | 105 | 25.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rod Laver | #662 | #3 | 0 | 2,300 | 576 | 147 | 79.7% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 72 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jorge Andrew | Rod Laver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #176 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #138 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #125 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1977 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1979 | 3–24 | 11.1% | #311 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,408 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 73–19 | 79.3% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 13 |
| 30 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,387 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 97–14 | 87.4% | — | 2,161 | 5 | 29 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,213 | 5 | 42 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 85–20 | 81.0% | — | 2,155 | 5 | 49 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 50–16 | 75.8% | — | 2,016 | 5 | 54 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 67–16 | 80.7% | #8 | 2,088 | 5 | 61 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 45–10 | 81.8% | #4 | 2,115 | 5 | 67 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,087 | 5 | 72 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #73 | 1,995 | 5 | 72 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,927 | 5 | 72 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #216 | 1,917 | 5 | 72 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,901 | 5 | 72 |