H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jose Acasuso vs Albert Portas H2H: 2-2
Jose Acasuso and Albert Portas are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2002 Buenos Aires third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2002* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-3 6-4 | Albert Portas | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2001* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Albert Portas | 7-6(2) 4-6 6-3 | Jose Acasuso | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2001* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Albert Portas | 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | Jose Acasuso | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2001* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-4 7-5 | Albert Portas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jose Acasuso | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |