H2H data updated: 2026-10-22 00:00 UTC

Jose Acasuso vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava H2H: 1-0

Jose Acasuso holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Munoz de la Nava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jose Acasuso leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2009 Argentina Open first round 6-2 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jose Acasuso
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Daniel Munoz de la Nava
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jose Acasuso #35 6-2 7-6(4) Daniel Munoz de la Nava #182 Match data Feb 19, 2009* R32 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jose Acasuso #1,107 #20 1,640 1,830 181 178 50.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Daniel Munoz de la Nava #1,384 #68 732 1,761 9 28 24.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jose Acasuso Daniel Munoz de la Nava
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2001 8–12 40.0% #86 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 21–17 55.3% #41 1,666 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2003 11–19 36.7% #101 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2004 18–16 52.9% #67 1,685 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2005 27–26 50.9% #40 1,725 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 2006 28–20 58.3% #27 1,710 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 2007 18–19 48.6% #65 1,686 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 2008 26–24 52.0% #48 1,697 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 2009 21–21 50.0% #51 1,733 0 3 2008 0–1 0.0% #179 1,532 0 0
27 2010 1–3 25.0% #253 1,667 0 3 2009 0–2 0.0% #216 1,585 0 0
28 2011 2–1 66.7% #255 1,657 0 3 2010 1–1 50.0% #147 1,621 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #140 1,581 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2012 3–4 42.9% #171 1,649 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2013 2–5 28.6% #194 1,698 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2014 0–1 0.0% #206 1,665 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2016 3–13 18.8% #351 1,508 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jose Acasuso Daniel Munoz de la Nava
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 20 10 30 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 3 8 11 27.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 18 11 29 62.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 9 10 19 47.4% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 6 10 16 37.5% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 67 109 38.5% 135 98 233 57.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — 3 7 10 30.0% 6 21 27 22.2% — — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/359 of Jose Acasuso's and 37/37 of Daniel Munoz de la Nava's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jose Acasuso Daniel Munoz de la Nava
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2001 18/20 5.4 2.1 47.2% 71.2% 48.0% 59.4% 40.6% 58.6% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 36/38 3.8 3.3 54.9% 71.4% 51.6% 57.5% 46.7% 62.1% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 29/30 4.8 3.1 56.4% 68.6% 50.8% 55.4% 40.1% 60.7% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 34/34 4.6 2.7 53.8% 72.2% 50.2% 46.7% 37.0% 62.1% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 52/53 7.6 2.6 54.1% 75.1% 53.0% 61.8% 40.6% 64.9% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 48/48 6.8 2.0 53.0% 74.9% 54.9% 60.2% 46.5% 65.5% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 37/37 4.6 2.6 54.8% 71.9% 49.8% 51.2% 42.5% 62.3% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 50/50 4.5 3.2 54.9% 72.1% 47.9% 57.8% 36.6% 61.0% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 42/42 5.1 2.5 55.4% 72.8% 50.5% 61.1% 39.9% 62.8% 34.6% 2008 1/1 0.0 1.0 55.9% 54.5% 30.8% 50.0% 42.9% 44.1% 41.1%
27 2010 4/4 6.5 2.8 60.8% 73.5% 55.2% 52.3% 47.9% 65.9% 38.2% 2009 2/2 4.5 3.0 58.7% 79.8% 35.2% 14.3% 48.8% 62.0% 36.3%
28 2011 3/3 2.3 0.7 55.7% 70.0% 59.0% 75.9% 43.9% 64.7% 37.4% 2010 2/2 3.5 1.5 55.5% 69.6% 51.6% 63.9% 56.7% 61.8% 32.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 5.0 5.0 52.8% 53.2% 47.6% 41.7% 44.4% 50.6% 41.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 7/7 1.0 3.1 58.0% 63.2% 44.0% 56.0% 47.4% 55.7% 42.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 7/7 2.9 4.0 54.0% 69.2% 51.2% 59.6% 23.8% 60.8% 31.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 1/1 4.0 7.0 61.7% 59.1% 48.8% 61.5% 66.7% 55.1% 29.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 16/16 3.5 4.3 58.2% 66.2% 50.5% 62.0% 35.1% 59.3% 34.7%
Career — 353/359 5.4 2.7 54.3% 72.6% 51.1% 57.3% 41.3% 62.7% 37.0% — 37/37 2.9 3.8 57.1% 66.3% 48.0% 57.1% 38.5% 58.4% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jose Acasuso Daniel Munoz de la Nava
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2000 1518 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1537 125.9 -1.22 -2.64 0.825 46.8% -26 +67 — 42.0% -0.64 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.0 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1667 134.9 -0.20 -0.36 0.990 49.8% -189 +134 — 52.8% +0.12 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) 103.5 +1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 1614 125.8 -0.09 -3.06 0.865 47.6% -127 +114 — 38.0% -0.53 5–5 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.5 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 1686 136.4 +0.65 -0.32 1.010 50.2% -228 +140 — 52.6% -0.08 4–4 (50%) 9–3 (75%) 103.8 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 1725 137.2 +2.49 -0.53 1.034 50.4% -82 +16 — 48.8% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 102.3 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 1711 145.1 +2.75 +0.79 1.124 52.1% -91 +141 — 56.3% +0.60 9–8 (53%) 8–12 (40%) 98.7 +2.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 1686 138.1 -0.78 +1.04 1.023 50.3% -59 +104 — 52.5% +0.01 1–4 (20%) 7–5 (58%) 98.6 +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 1697 140.0 -1.63 +0.93 0.973 49.5% -55 +78 — 50.9% +0.17 8–6 (57%) 5–11 (31%) 98.5 +1.79 2007 1482 103.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 1733 148.1 0.00 -1.51 0.931 48.9% -59 +71 — 53.8% +0.22 5–3 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 101.0 -0.56 2008 1533 109.1 -0.08 -4.07 0.734 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04
27 2010 1668 108.9 -1.74 -1.64 1.122 51.9% — — — 37.5% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.71 2009 1585 116.4 -1.87 -0.33 0.957 49.0% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.14
28 2011 1657 116.1 +0.80 +1.94 1.062 50.7% — +93 — 57.1% +1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.36 2010 1622 114.8 -1.38 +2.12 0.841 46.5% — — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.03
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1582 112.3 +0.84 -1.89 0.845 46.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.32
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1650 128.4 -1.16 +1.19 0.964 49.3% — +75 — 41.2% -0.47 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1699 128.4 -1.53 -1.91 0.813 46.9% -1 — — 30.0% -1.40 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 -0.64
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1665 113.3 -1.03 +0.40 0.665 45.4% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.09
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1568 105.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1509 118.8 -2.81 -1.89 0.853 46.8% +140 +10 — 31.8% -1.20 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 96.6 +0.60
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1488 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1445 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1830 143.9 +0.39 -0.37 0.991 49.8% -86 +97 — 50.5% +0.05 47–45 (51%) 59–66 (47%) 101.2 +1.62 — 1762 123.5 -1.91 -1.01 0.863 47.2% +62 +34 — 33.0% -1.14 6–12 (33%) 5–10 (33%) 94.5 +0.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.