H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jose Acasuso vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava H2H: 1-0
Jose Acasuso holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Munoz de la Nava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jose Acasuso leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2009 Buenos Aires third round 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2009* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-2 7-6(4) | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Daniel Munoz de la Nava | #1,384 | #68 | 732 | 1,761 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jose Acasuso | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #351 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |