H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Jose Acasuso vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 2-1

Jose Acasuso holds a 2–1 lead over Guillermo Canas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jose Acasuso leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2008 Metz round of 32 6-3 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jose Acasuso
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Guillermo Canas
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jose Acasuso #47 6-3 2-6 6-3 Guillermo Canas #55 Match data Oct 2, 2008* R32 Metz International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jose Acasuso #46 4-6 6-2 6-2 Guillermo Canas #22 Match data Feb 29, 2008* R16 Mexican Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Guillermo Canas #12 6-4 6-3 Jose Acasuso #58 Match data Oct 25, 2007* R32 Swiss Indoors International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jose Acasuso #1,107 #20 1,640 1,830 181 178 50.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Guillermo Canas #1,110 #8 2,075 1,991 245 189 56.5% 0 1 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jose Acasuso Guillermo Canas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2001 8–12 40.0% #86 1,536 0 0 1996 0–3 0.0% #183 1,461 0 0
19 2002 21–17 55.3% #41 1,666 0 1 1997 1–4 20.0% #129 1,460 0 0
20 2003 11–19 36.7% #101 1,614 0 1 1998 6–14 30.0% #95 1,480 0 0
21 2004 18–16 52.9% #67 1,685 0 2 1999 15–23 39.5% #71 1,575 0 0
22 2005 27–26 50.9% #40 1,725 0 2 2000 5–12 29.4% #231 1,530 0 0
23 2006 28–20 58.3% #27 1,710 0 3 2001 45–21 68.2% #15 1,839 0 1
24 2007 18–19 48.6% #65 1,686 0 3 2002 41–22 65.1% #15 1,856 0 3
25 2008 26–24 52.0% #48 1,697 0 3 2003 5–4 55.6% #272 1,804 0 3
26 2009 21–21 50.0% #51 1,733 0 3 2004 40–21 65.6% #12 1,900 0 6
27 2010 1–3 25.0% #253 1,667 0 3 2005 22–11 66.7% #102 1,870 0 6
28 2011 2–1 66.7% #255 1,657 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — 2007 38–21 64.4% #15 1,817 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 2008 22–20 52.4% #79 1,684 0 7
31 — — — — — — — 2009 5–13 27.8% #191 1,626 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jose Acasuso Guillermo Canas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 20 10 30 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2003 3 8 11 27.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
21 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 18 11 29 62.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1999 1 6 7 14.3% 12 11 23 52.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
22 2005 9 10 19 47.4% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2006 6 10 16 37.5% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 19 10 29 65.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2007 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 16 8 24 66.7% 20 11 31 64.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2008 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2003 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 19 8 27 70.4% 17 10 27 63.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 7 3 10 70.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
28 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 15 10 25 60.0% 20 8 28 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 9 9 18 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 42 67 109 38.5% 135 98 233 57.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — 97 78 175 55.4% 117 82 199 58.8% 26 18 44 59.1% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/359 of Jose Acasuso's and 398/434 of Guillermo Canas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jose Acasuso Guillermo Canas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2001 18/20 5.4 2.1 47.2% 71.2% 48.0% 59.4% 40.6% 58.6% 34.2% 1996 1/3 1.0 4.0 47.6% 62.5% 54.5% 50.0% 50.0% 58.3% 40.7%
19 2002 36/38 3.8 3.3 54.9% 71.4% 51.6% 57.5% 46.7% 62.1% 37.5% 1997 5/5 5.2 2.8 50.9% 70.7% 47.1% 52.2% 43.1% 58.5% 38.0%
20 2003 29/30 4.8 3.1 56.4% 68.6% 50.8% 55.4% 40.1% 60.7% 34.0% 1998 14/20 5.4 3.8 53.2% 72.2% 46.0% 62.4% 40.8% 59.7% 37.0%
21 2004 34/34 4.6 2.7 53.8% 72.2% 50.2% 46.7% 37.0% 62.1% 38.3% 1999 31/38 2.8 3.1 57.2% 69.1% 52.5% 63.4% 42.8% 61.6% 41.1%
22 2005 52/53 7.6 2.6 54.1% 75.1% 53.0% 61.8% 40.6% 64.9% 36.3% 2000 15/17 3.8 4.3 53.3% 67.7% 44.7% 44.1% 44.4% 57.1% 38.5%
23 2006 48/48 6.8 2.0 53.0% 74.9% 54.9% 60.2% 46.5% 65.5% 38.8% 2001 57/66 5.8 2.7 60.7% 71.3% 51.9% 58.7% 44.3% 63.7% 42.8%
24 2007 37/37 4.6 2.6 54.8% 71.9% 49.8% 51.2% 42.5% 62.3% 38.6% 2002 58/63 5.2 2.6 59.7% 73.3% 54.6% 56.6% 43.3% 65.7% 41.4%
25 2008 50/50 4.5 3.2 54.9% 72.1% 47.9% 57.8% 36.6% 61.0% 38.0% 2003 9/9 4.9 4.6 62.9% 71.5% 46.3% 60.8% 35.2% 62.1% 39.9%
26 2009 42/42 5.1 2.5 55.4% 72.8% 50.5% 61.1% 39.9% 62.8% 34.6% 2004 61/61 4.8 3.4 58.7% 73.8% 54.8% 59.2% 48.3% 66.0% 41.5%
27 2010 4/4 6.5 2.8 60.8% 73.5% 55.2% 52.3% 47.9% 65.9% 38.2% 2005 32/33 3.5 2.4 60.6% 70.6% 53.3% 63.3% 47.0% 64.3% 43.3%
28 2011 3/3 2.3 0.7 55.7% 70.0% 59.0% 75.9% 43.9% 64.7% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 58/59 5.7 2.1 57.3% 73.5% 52.7% 60.3% 48.0% 64.7% 40.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 39/42 5.9 2.9 53.9% 71.1% 50.0% 54.1% 44.9% 61.4% 38.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 18/18 5.8 3.2 51.2% 73.2% 49.3% 62.8% 49.0% 62.0% 35.9%
Career — 353/359 5.4 2.7 54.3% 72.6% 51.1% 57.3% 41.3% 62.7% 37.0% — 398/434 5.0 2.9 57.7% 72.0% 52.0% 58.7% 45.3% 63.6% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jose Acasuso Guillermo Canas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2000 1518 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1537 125.9 -1.22 -2.64 0.825 46.8% -26 +67 — 42.0% -0.64 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.0 -0.39 1996 1462 97.5 +1.04 -2.26 0.976 49.1% — — — 25.0% -1.62 0–2 1–0 — +0.33
19 2002 1667 134.9 -0.20 -0.36 0.990 49.8% -189 +134 — 52.8% +0.12 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) 103.5 +1.97 1997 1461 111.0 +1.67 -1.40 0.916 47.7% +43 — — 33.3% -1.25 0–2 1–0 — -0.22
20 2003 1614 125.8 -0.09 -3.06 0.865 47.6% -127 +114 — 38.0% -0.53 5–5 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.5 -0.45 1998 1481 121.3 -1.19 -0.67 0.917 48.3% +38 +4 +126 40.4% -0.50 1–6 (14%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 +0.36
21 2004 1686 136.4 +0.65 -0.32 1.010 50.2% -228 +141 — 52.6% -0.08 4–4 (50%) 9–3 (75%) 103.8 -0.74 1999 1575 128.1 +0.38 +2.60 1.070 51.2% -99 +35 +40 42.7% -0.46 3–7 (30%) 8–7 (53%) 101.0 -1.21
22 2005 1725 137.2 +2.49 -0.53 1.034 50.4% -82 +16 — 48.8% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 102.3 +0.52 2000 1530 126.2 -2.48 +0.32 0.898 47.3% -56 +30 — 34.1% -0.98 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.39
23 2006 1711 145.1 +2.75 +0.79 1.124 52.1% -91 +141 — 56.3% +0.60 9–8 (53%) 8–12 (40%) 98.7 +2.36 2001 1839 149.5 +2.44 +4.53 1.177 52.9% -76 -16 -135 60.0% +0.79 15–5 (75%) 9–13 (41%) 109.3 +0.72
24 2007 1686 138.1 -0.78 +1.04 1.023 50.3% -59 +104 — 52.5% +0.01 1–4 (20%) 7–5 (58%) 98.6 +0.97 2002 1856 149.5 +2.94 +3.27 1.208 53.1% -23 +31 -142 60.5% +0.74 11–10 (52%) 13–11 (54%) 98.1 +1.54
25 2008 1697 140.0 -1.63 +0.93 0.973 49.5% -55 +78 — 50.9% +0.17 8–6 (57%) 5–11 (31%) 98.5 +1.79 2003 1804 118.1 -0.44 +1.57 1.054 50.7% -9 — — 52.2% +0.09 2–0 3–2 (60%) — +0.24
26 2009 1733 148.1 0.00 -1.51 0.931 48.9% -59 +71 — 53.8% +0.22 5–3 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 101.0 -0.56 2004 1901 152.0 +3.45 +3.93 1.218 53.4% +11 +13 -212 61.9% +0.86 10–11 (48%) 11–9 (55%) 98.4 -1.25
27 2010 1668 108.9 -1.74 -1.64 1.122 51.9% — — — 37.5% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.71 2005 1871 147.8 +2.24 +5.12 1.212 53.3% +67 +11 -120 64.1% +1.00 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) 97.1 +0.92
28 2011 1657 116.1 +0.80 +1.94 1.062 50.7% — +93 — 57.1% +1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1818 155.4 +2.37 +3.32 1.149 52.4% +52 +124 -35 64.0% +0.84 5–7 (42%) 18–6 (75%) 103.0 -1.01
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1685 140.5 -1.38 +1.60 1.006 50.1% +67 +164 +92 48.0% 0.00 8–5 (62%) 5–12 (29%) 94.1 +1.08
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1627 123.4 -1.48 -0.18 0.946 49.5% +28 +135 — 37.5% -0.44 1–5 (17%) 2–6 (25%) 89.2 +0.68
Career — 1830 143.9 +0.39 -0.37 0.991 49.8% -86 +97 — 50.5% +0.05 47–45 (51%) 59–66 (47%) 101.2 +1.62 — 1992 149.7 +1.54 +2.98 1.119 51.9% 0 +50 -51 54.9% +0.39 60–69 (47%) 81–78 (51%) 97.0 +0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.