H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jose Acasuso vs Igor Kunitsyn H2H: 1-1
Jose Acasuso and Igor Kunitsyn are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Kunitsyn won the 2010 Australian Open first round 6-1 2-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Igor Kunitsyn | 6-1 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Jose Acasuso | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2009* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jose Acasuso | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | Igor Kunitsyn | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Igor Kunitsyn | #1,093 | #35 | 1,562 | 1,755 | 87 | 149 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jose Acasuso | Igor Kunitsyn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #129 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #47 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 16–30 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #100 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #71 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #162 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |