H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jose Acasuso vs Max Mirnyi H2H: 1-1
Jose Acasuso and Max Mirnyi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jose Acasuso leads 1–0 on clay, while Max Mirnyi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Max Mirnyi won the 2008 Indian Wells Masters first round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2008* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 7-5 7-5 | Jose Acasuso | Match data |
| May 25, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-4 7-6(9) 6-2 | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jose Acasuso | Max Mirnyi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |