H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jose Acasuso vs Maximo Gonzalez H2H: 1-0
Jose Acasuso holds a 1–0 lead over Maximo Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jose Acasuso leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2009 New Haven second round 6-1 6-7(7) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2009* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jose Acasuso | 6-1 6-7(7) 6-2 | Maximo Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Maximo Gonzalez | #467 | #58 | 992 | 1,702 | 28 | 60 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jose Acasuso | Maximo Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #121 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #132 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #66 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #141 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #347 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #150 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #392 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |