H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Jose Acasuso vs Peter Luczak H2H: 1-1
Jose Acasuso and Peter Luczak are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jose Acasuso leads 1–0 on clay, while Peter Luczak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Luczak won the 2010 Sydney third round 7-6(1) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2010* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Peter Luczak | 7-6(1) 6-4 | Jose Acasuso | Match data |
| Jan 31, 2008* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-2 6-4 | Peter Luczak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Peter Luczak | #1,007 | #64 | 775 | 1,685 | 37 | 80 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jose Acasuso | Peter Luczak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #150 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #166 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #156 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #77 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #137 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |