H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Jose Acasuso vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 0-2

Radek Stepanek holds a 2–0 lead over Jose Acasuso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2006 Hamburg Masters semifinal 6-4 7-6(5).

ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 2
2 main draw meetings
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 21, 2006* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Radek Stepanek #16 6-4 7-6(5) Jose Acasuso #30 Match data
Oct 22, 2005* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Radek Stepanek #14 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(5) Jose Acasuso #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jose Acasuso #1,107 #20 1,640 1,830 181 178 50.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jose Acasuso Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2001 8–12 40.0% #86 1,537 0 0
19 2002 21–17 55.3% #41 1,667 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2003 11–19 36.7% #101 1,613 0 1 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2004 18–16 52.9% #67 1,678 0 2
22 2005 27–26 50.9% #40 1,724 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2006 28–20 58.3% #27 1,709 0 3 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2007 18–19 48.6% #65 1,685 0 3 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2008 26–24 52.0% #48 1,697 0 3 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2009 21–21 50.0% #51 1,731 0 3 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2010 1–3 25.0% #253 1,666 0 3 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2011 2–1 66.7% #255 1,656 0 3 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5