H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jose Acasuso vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 0-1

Sargis Sargsian holds a 1–0 lead over Jose Acasuso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 2001 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jose Acasuso
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sargis Sargsian
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sargis Sargsian #124 6-3 6-1 6-4 Jose Acasuso #81 Match data Jun 27, 2001* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jose Acasuso #1,107 #20 1,640 1,830 181 178 50.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 156 208 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jose Acasuso Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2001 8–12 40.0% #86 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 21–17 55.3% #41 1,666 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2003 11–19 36.7% #101 1,614 0 1 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 2004 18–16 52.9% #67 1,685 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2005 27–26 50.9% #40 1,725 0 2 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 2006 28–20 58.3% #27 1,710 0 3 1996 4–6 40.0% #104 1,576 0 0
24 2007 18–19 48.6% #65 1,686 0 3 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,628 0 1
25 2008 26–24 52.0% #48 1,697 0 3 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,617 0 1
26 2009 21–21 50.0% #51 1,733 0 3 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,636 0 1
27 2010 1–3 25.0% #253 1,667 0 3 2000 15–26 36.6% #94 1,566 0 1
28 2011 2–1 66.7% #255 1,657 0 3 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,624 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,649 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2004 17–27 38.6% #75 1,697 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,589 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jose Acasuso Sargis Sargsian
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 20 10 30 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 3 8 11 27.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 18 11 29 62.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 9 10 19 47.4% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 6 10 16 37.5% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2007 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 8 11 19 42.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 2008 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1998 6 13 19 31.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 6 12 18 33.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2001 7 10 17 41.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 13 12 25 52.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 14 23 39.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 67 109 38.5% 135 98 233 57.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — 68 103 171 39.8% 45 58 103 43.7% 28 30 58 48.3% 15 17 32 46.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/359 of Jose Acasuso's and 313/364 of Sargis Sargsian's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jose Acasuso Sargis Sargsian
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2001 18/20 5.4 2.1 47.2% 71.2% 48.0% 59.4% 40.6% 58.6% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 36/38 3.8 3.3 54.9% 71.4% 51.6% 57.5% 46.7% 62.1% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 29/30 4.8 3.1 56.4% 68.6% 50.8% 55.4% 40.1% 60.7% 34.0% 1993 2/2 1.0 3.0 62.4% 56.6% 57.6% 68.3% 34.5% 57.6% 36.0%
21 2004 34/34 4.6 2.7 53.8% 72.2% 50.2% 46.7% 37.0% 62.1% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 52/53 7.6 2.6 54.1% 75.1% 53.0% 61.8% 40.6% 64.9% 36.3% 1995 2/4 5.0 7.0 57.5% 78.7% 29.9% 46.7% 47.4% 58.4% 33.4%
23 2006 48/48 6.8 2.0 53.0% 74.9% 54.9% 60.2% 46.5% 65.5% 38.8% 1996 7/10 2.1 4.0 58.5% 69.3% 46.1% 51.7% 41.0% 60.0% 42.4%
24 2007 37/37 4.6 2.6 54.8% 71.9% 49.8% 51.2% 42.5% 62.3% 38.6% 1997 31/41 4.3 3.4 58.0% 66.1% 50.7% 54.6% 38.3% 59.6% 35.6%
25 2008 50/50 4.5 3.2 54.9% 72.1% 47.9% 57.8% 36.6% 61.0% 38.0% 1998 33/43 4.5 3.1 60.5% 71.0% 50.9% 61.1% 43.1% 63.0% 38.8%
26 2009 42/42 5.1 2.5 55.4% 72.8% 50.5% 61.1% 39.9% 62.8% 34.6% 1999 33/44 3.8 2.5 60.7% 70.1% 50.3% 68.4% 40.9% 62.0% 39.0%
27 2010 4/4 6.5 2.8 60.8% 73.5% 55.2% 52.3% 47.9% 65.9% 38.2% 2000 33/41 3.7 3.0 60.4% 66.5% 45.5% 55.1% 39.0% 58.0% 38.0%
28 2011 3/3 2.3 0.7 55.7% 70.0% 59.0% 75.9% 43.9% 64.7% 37.4% 2001 32/35 3.7 3.3 59.1% 68.7% 48.5% 54.0% 46.3% 60.2% 38.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 29/32 5.0 3.2 56.7% 67.3% 49.4% 51.7% 39.2% 59.6% 34.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 54/54 4.1 3.4 61.7% 69.5% 51.8% 57.0% 47.3% 62.8% 39.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 43/44 4.8 3.0 63.2% 67.8% 48.6% 52.9% 33.9% 60.3% 36.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 12/12 3.0 4.3 59.9% 56.7% 37.4% 46.5% 49.0% 48.7% 30.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 0.5 6.5 60.0% 56.3% 39.5% 57.7% 16.7% 49.5% 28.9%
Career — 353/359 5.4 2.7 54.3% 72.6% 51.1% 57.3% 41.3% 62.7% 37.0% — 313/364 4.1 3.2 60.3% 67.9% 48.9% 56.3% 41.4% 60.3% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jose Acasuso Sargis Sargsian
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2000 1518 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1537 125.9 -1.22 -2.64 0.825 46.8% -26 +67 — 42.0% -0.64 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.0 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1667 134.9 -0.20 -0.36 0.990 49.8% -189 +134 — 52.8% +0.12 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) 103.5 +1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 1614 125.8 -0.09 -3.06 0.865 47.6% -127 +114 — 38.0% -0.53 5–5 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.5 -0.45 1993 1514 106.3 -1.99 -0.78 0.850 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 1–1 — -0.04
21 2004 1686 136.4 +0.65 -0.32 1.010 50.2% -228 +141 — 52.6% -0.08 4–4 (50%) 9–3 (75%) 103.8 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 1725 137.2 +2.49 -0.53 1.034 50.4% -82 +16 — 48.8% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 102.3 +0.52 1995 1568 112.7 -0.77 +0.75 0.802 46.7% +23 — — 40.0% -0.73 2–0 1–0 — -0.16
23 2006 1711 145.1 +2.75 +0.79 1.124 52.1% -91 +141 — 56.3% +0.60 9–8 (53%) 8–12 (40%) 98.7 +2.36 1996 1577 128.3 -1.13 +3.09 1.060 51.0% +44 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.38
24 2007 1686 138.1 -0.78 +1.04 1.023 50.3% -59 +104 — 52.5% +0.01 1–4 (20%) 7–5 (58%) 98.6 +0.97 1997 1628 125.8 -1.73 -0.98 0.881 47.6% -2 -131 +80 42.7% -0.72 7–9 (44%) 10–6 (63%) 106.1 -0.39
25 2008 1697 140.0 -1.63 +0.93 0.973 49.5% -55 +78 — 50.9% +0.17 8–6 (57%) 5–11 (31%) 98.5 +1.79 1998 1618 121.9 +0.65 +0.48 1.050 50.9% -61 -75 +114 46.4% -0.07 6–11 (35%) 8–12 (40%) 92.3 +1.49
26 2009 1733 148.1 0.00 -1.51 0.931 48.9% -59 +71 — 53.8% +0.22 5–3 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 101.0 -0.56 1999 1637 132.5 +0.09 +1.23 1.029 50.7% -86 +41 +71 49.1% -0.06 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) 95.6 -0.70
27 2010 1668 108.9 -1.74 -1.64 1.122 51.9% — — — 37.5% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.71 2000 1566 128.7 -2.68 +0.64 0.906 47.9% -40 +100 +90 37.0% -0.66 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 98.9 +1.47
28 2011 1657 116.1 +0.80 +1.94 1.062 50.7% — +93 — 57.1% +1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.36 2001 1625 130.0 -2.01 +0.60 0.956 49.3% -63 +51 +50 46.7% -0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) 100.6 +0.20
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1650 127.4 -1.35 -1.75 0.846 47.0% -4 -26 -15 41.7% -0.71 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 103.1 -0.86
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1775 142.7 +1.40 +2.44 1.066 51.2% -3 -112 -142 53.7% +0.49 4–6 (40%) 4–8 (33%) 96.5 -1.63
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1697 135.9 -1.71 +0.83 0.929 48.5% +25 -58 -94 40.7% -0.52 8–6 (57%) 8–6 (57%) 102.9 -2.22
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1589 91.9 -8.24 -4.38 0.602 40.3% +84 +23 -61 22.2% -2.26 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.23
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1577 106.8 -0.31 -1.11 0.571 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.39
Career — 1830 143.9 +0.39 -0.37 0.991 49.8% -86 +97 — 50.5% +0.05 47–45 (51%) 59–66 (47%) 101.2 +1.62 — 1812 135.5 -1.06 +0.48 0.943 48.9% -15 -12 +31 44.2% -0.34 49–64 (43%) 60–59 (50%) 99.6 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.