H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jose Acasuso vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 0-1

Teymuraz Gabashvili holds a 1–0 lead over Jose Acasuso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Teymuraz Gabashvili won the 2009 Indian Wells Open first round 6-2 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jose Acasuso
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Teymuraz Gabashvili
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Teymuraz Gabashvili #76 6-2 4-6 6-3 Jose Acasuso #42 Match data Mar 14, 2009* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jose Acasuso #1,107 #20 1,640 1,830 181 178 50.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Teymuraz Gabashvili #1,373 #43 1,226 1,838 110 196 35.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jose Acasuso Teymuraz Gabashvili
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2001 8–12 40.0% #86 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 21–17 55.3% #41 1,666 0 1 2004 0–2 0.0% #258 1,482 0 0
20 2003 11–19 36.7% #101 1,614 0 1 2005 2–4 33.3% #132 1,460 0 0
21 2004 18–16 52.9% #67 1,685 0 2 2006 6–12 33.3% #112 1,518 0 0
22 2005 27–26 50.9% #40 1,725 0 2 2007 10–28 26.3% #125 1,600 0 0
23 2006 28–20 58.3% #27 1,710 0 3 2008 13–13 50.0% #65 1,663 0 0
24 2007 18–19 48.6% #65 1,686 0 3 2009 12–24 33.3% #106 1,558 0 0
25 2008 26–24 52.0% #48 1,697 0 3 2010 10–16 38.5% #80 1,689 0 0
26 2009 21–21 50.0% #51 1,733 0 3 2011 10–19 34.5% #138 1,658 0 0
27 2010 1–3 25.0% #253 1,667 0 3 2012 1–4 20.0% #182 1,581 0 0
28 2011 2–1 66.7% #255 1,657 0 3 2013 2–2 50.0% #76 1,626 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2014 18–26 40.9% #67 1,737 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2015 16–21 43.2% #50 1,775 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2016 10–22 31.2% #138 1,628 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2017 0–3 0.0% #237 1,535 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jose Acasuso Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 20 10 30 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2003 3 8 11 27.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 18 11 29 62.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2005 9 10 19 47.4% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2006 6 10 16 37.5% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2008 7 8 15 46.7% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
24 2007 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 5 12 17 29.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 2008 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 67 109 38.5% 135 98 233 57.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — 60 109 169 35.5% 41 63 104 39.4% 6 17 23 26.1% 3 7 10 30.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 353/359 of Jose Acasuso's and 301/306 of Teymuraz Gabashvili's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jose Acasuso Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2001 18/20 5.4 2.1 47.2% 71.2% 48.0% 59.4% 40.6% 58.6% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 36/38 3.8 3.3 54.9% 71.4% 51.6% 57.5% 46.7% 62.1% 37.5% 2004 2/2 5.0 3.5 56.2% 66.0% 28.1% 48.4% 50.0% 49.4% 32.5%
20 2003 29/30 4.8 3.1 56.4% 68.6% 50.8% 55.4% 40.1% 60.7% 34.0% 2005 6/6 5.0 2.7 52.8% 70.5% 47.3% 34.2% 38.1% 59.4% 37.5%
21 2004 34/34 4.6 2.7 53.8% 72.2% 50.2% 46.7% 37.0% 62.1% 38.3% 2006 18/18 5.3 3.2 55.1% 72.1% 53.6% 52.0% 32.9% 63.4% 34.2%
22 2005 52/53 7.6 2.6 54.1% 75.1% 53.0% 61.8% 40.6% 64.9% 36.3% 2007 38/38 5.6 4.8 54.2% 72.1% 45.6% 56.5% 44.0% 60.0% 31.5%
23 2006 48/48 6.8 2.0 53.0% 74.9% 54.9% 60.2% 46.5% 65.5% 38.8% 2008 25/26 4.6 3.2 60.7% 70.7% 47.9% 63.6% 48.7% 62.0% 35.9%
24 2007 37/37 4.6 2.6 54.8% 71.9% 49.8% 51.2% 42.5% 62.3% 38.6% 2009 35/36 4.7 5.5 55.0% 67.4% 45.1% 57.1% 41.8% 57.5% 33.6%
25 2008 50/50 4.5 3.2 54.9% 72.1% 47.9% 57.8% 36.6% 61.0% 38.0% 2010 26/26 5.3 3.7 55.5% 73.9% 51.4% 58.3% 36.9% 63.7% 34.9%
26 2009 42/42 5.1 2.5 55.4% 72.8% 50.5% 61.1% 39.9% 62.8% 34.6% 2011 28/29 2.9 3.6 59.1% 64.8% 49.8% 45.4% 32.9% 58.5% 35.4%
27 2010 4/4 6.5 2.8 60.8% 73.5% 55.2% 52.3% 47.9% 65.9% 38.2% 2012 5/5 2.2 3.0 60.3% 66.8% 46.6% 53.5% 37.9% 60.2% 39.8%
28 2011 3/3 2.3 0.7 55.7% 70.0% 59.0% 75.9% 43.9% 64.7% 37.4% 2013 4/4 5.3 2.5 60.4% 64.5% 55.9% 66.9% 27.0% 61.0% 35.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 43/44 3.1 3.0 59.2% 67.2% 47.4% 55.2% 37.8% 58.9% 36.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 37/37 5.4 4.4 56.7% 72.4% 51.7% 65.8% 36.9% 63.4% 35.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 31/32 4.3 4.1 57.8% 71.0% 46.5% 56.8% 39.4% 60.7% 35.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 3/3 5.7 3.0 55.8% 73.1% 45.8% 43.5% 19.7% 60.8% 33.6%
Career — 353/359 5.4 2.7 54.3% 72.6% 51.1% 57.3% 41.3% 62.7% 37.0% — 301/306 4.5 3.9 57.0% 69.9% 48.3% 56.5% 39.0% 60.5% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jose Acasuso Teymuraz Gabashvili
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2000 1518 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1537 125.9 -1.22 -2.64 0.825 46.8% -26 +67 — 42.0% -0.64 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.0 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1667 134.9 -0.20 -0.36 0.990 49.8% -189 +134 — 52.8% +0.12 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) 103.5 +1.97 2004 1483 99.7 -2.62 -3.21 0.643 42.2% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.04
20 2003 1614 125.8 -0.09 -3.06 0.865 47.6% -127 +114 — 38.0% -0.53 5–5 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.5 -0.45 2005 1460 104.7 -1.72 +0.46 0.923 48.0% +39 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) — — -0.05
21 2004 1686 136.4 +0.65 -0.32 1.010 50.2% -228 +141 — 52.6% -0.08 4–4 (50%) 9–3 (75%) 103.8 -0.74 2006 1519 124.5 +0.17 -2.07 0.934 48.3% +30 -56 — 39.1% -0.56 4–5 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 104.6 +0.08
22 2005 1725 137.2 +2.49 -0.53 1.034 50.4% -82 +16 — 48.8% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 102.3 +0.52 2007 1601 122.2 -2.72 -4.45 0.786 46.1% +27 -120 -80 32.2% -1.19 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) 94.0 +0.15
23 2006 1711 145.1 +2.75 +0.79 1.124 52.1% -91 +141 — 56.3% +0.60 9–8 (53%) 8–12 (40%) 98.7 +2.36 2008 1663 125.3 -1.37 -0.76 0.945 49.3% +18 -115 — 51.6% -0.16 3–5 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -0.30
24 2007 1686 138.1 -0.78 +1.04 1.023 50.3% -59 +104 — 52.5% +0.01 1–4 (20%) 7–5 (58%) 98.6 +0.97 2009 1558 127.3 -4.68 -2.56 0.791 46.0% 0 +87 -54 35.2% -1.04 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 -1.33
25 2008 1697 140.0 -1.63 +0.93 0.973 49.5% -55 +78 — 50.9% +0.17 8–6 (57%) 5–11 (31%) 98.5 +1.79 2010 1690 131.4 +0.51 -0.82 0.960 49.6% -79 +40 — 45.1% -0.13 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 91.9 -0.07
26 2009 1733 148.1 0.00 -1.51 0.931 48.9% -59 +71 — 53.8% +0.22 5–3 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 101.0 -0.56 2011 1659 129.5 -3.46 -1.02 0.853 46.9% -19 -3 -119 37.5% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 9–5 (64%) 102.0 -1.17
27 2010 1668 108.9 -1.74 -1.64 1.122 51.9% — — — 37.5% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.71 2012 1582 110.0 -1.43 -0.89 1.001 50.1% +36 — — 30.8% -0.69 0–1 1–1 — +0.59
28 2011 1657 116.1 +0.80 +1.94 1.062 50.7% — +93 — 57.1% +1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.36 2013 1626 123.4 +0.15 -1.01 0.917 48.3% +2 — — 36.4% -0.27 2–0 0–2 — +0.01
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1738 145.9 -3.57 +0.71 0.898 48.1% -11 -21 — 42.5% -0.47 6–4 (60%) 4–8 (33%) 100.8 -0.72
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1776 146.4 -0.48 +0.12 0.968 49.3% -81 +102 — 45.7% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 103.2 -1.36
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1628 128.0 -2.29 -1.28 0.903 48.3% -27 +144 -72 37.3% -0.49 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 95.2 +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1535 104.6 -1.16 -2.90 0.856 46.0% — — — 30.0% -1.50 0–2 1–1 — +0.47
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1511 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1498 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1474 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1830 143.9 +0.39 -0.37 0.991 49.8% -86 +97 — 50.5% +0.05 47–45 (51%) 59–66 (47%) 101.2 +1.62 — 1839 133.8 -2.16 -1.30 0.885 47.9% -15 +19 -83 39.9% -0.64 41–62 (40%) 53–54 (50%) 97.0 -1.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.