H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Jose Acasuso vs Tomas Zib H2H: 1-1
Jose Acasuso and Tomas Zib are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on grass, while Jose Acasuso leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2006 Miami Masters first round 5-7 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2006* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jose Acasuso | 5-7 6-1 6-1 | Tomas Zib | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Tomas Zib | 7-5 6-3 6-3 | Jose Acasuso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jose Acasuso | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |