H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jose Higueras vs Patrick Proisy H2H: 2-1
Jose Higueras holds a 2–1 lead over Patrick Proisy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jose Higueras leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Patrick Proisy won the 1980 Monte Carlo third round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 73
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 76
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1980* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Patrick Proisy | 6-1 7-5 | Jose Higueras | Match data |
| Apr 22, 1978* | Nice | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Jose Higueras | 6-1 6-2 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
| May 1, 1977* | Munich | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Jose Higueras | 6-4 6-3 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Higueras | #335 | #6 | 0 | 2,088 | 427 | 226 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 17 |
| Patrick Proisy | #232 | #23 | 0 | 1,876 | 220 | 193 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jose Higueras | Patrick Proisy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #128 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #46 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1976 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #42 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #41 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1977 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #30 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #69 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1978 | 62–19 | 76.5% | #14 | 2,008 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1979 | 61–22 | 73.5% | #9 | 1,959 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #104 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1980 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #30 | 1,848 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1981 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #35 | 1,758 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1982 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #12 | 1,929 | 0 | 12 | 1979 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1983 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #7 | 1,931 | 0 | 15 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #158 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1984 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 17 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #182 | 1,687 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #330 | 1,722 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |