H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jose Luis Clerc vs Claudio Panatta H2H: 1-1
Jose Luis Clerc and Claudio Panatta are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jose Luis Clerc leads 1–0 on clay, while Claudio Panatta leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jose Luis Clerc won the 1985 Rome third round 6-4 1-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 67
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1985* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jose Luis Clerc | 6-4 1-6 7-6 | Claudio Panatta | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1983* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Claudio Panatta | 6-1 6-4 6-2 | Jose Luis Clerc | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Luis Clerc | #1,263 | #4 | 20 | 2,217 | 361 | 141 | 71.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 26 |
| Claudio Panatta | #1,038 | #46 | 18 | 1,748 | 100 | 135 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jose Luis Clerc | Claudio Panatta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #278 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1978 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #15 | 1,861 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1980 | 68–22 | 75.6% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 11 | 1981 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #482 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #5 | 2,061 | 0 | 17 | 1982 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #76 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 66–23 | 74.2% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 22 | 1983 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #8 | 1,894 | 0 | 26 | 1984 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #121 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,824 | 0 | 26 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1985 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #28 | 1,811 | 0 | 26 | 1986 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #153 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #132 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #557 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #514 | 1,722 | 0 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |