H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jose Luis Clerc vs Roberto Arguello H2H: 1-1
Jose Luis Clerc and Roberto Arguello are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Jose Luis Clerc won the 1985 Hamburg fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 67
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1985* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jose Luis Clerc | 6-2 6-3 | Roberto Arguello | Match data |
| Aug 1, 1983 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Roberto Arguello | 6-1 (ret.) | Jose Luis Clerc | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Luis Clerc | #1,263 | #4 | 20 | 2,217 | 361 | 141 | 71.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 26 |
| Roberto Arguello | #829 | #38 | 144 | 1,718 | 60 | 82 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jose Luis Clerc | Roberto Arguello | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #278 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #15 | 1,861 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #50 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1980 | 68–22 | 75.6% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 11 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1981 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #5 | 2,061 | 0 | 17 | 1985 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1982 | 66–23 | 74.2% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 22 | 1986 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #231 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1983 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #8 | 1,894 | 0 | 26 | 1987 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #177 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1984 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,824 | 0 | 26 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #177 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1985 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #28 | 1,811 | 0 | 26 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #190 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #217 | 1,465 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #514 | 1,722 | 0 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |