H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jose Luis Clerc vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 0-1

Roscoe Tanner holds a 1–0 lead over Jose Luis Clerc in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roscoe Tanner leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1979 Wimbledon round of 16 6-7 7-6 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jose Luis Clerc
ARG Age 68 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roscoe Tanner #6 6-7 7-6 6-4 6-1 Jose Luis Clerc #14 Match data Jul 4, 1979* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jose Luis Clerc #1,263 #4 20 2,219 355 138 72.0% 0 0 0 1 24 25
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jose Luis Clerc Roscoe Tanner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
18 1977 1–3 25.0% #366 1,488 0 0 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,416 0 0
19 1978 50–17 74.6% #15 1,862 0 3 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,706 0 0
20 1979 53–22 70.7% #17 1,931 0 4 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,910 0 0
21 1980 65–20 76.5% #8 2,016 0 10 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0
22 1981 54–12 81.8% #5 2,071 0 16 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2
23 1982 66–23 74.2% #6 1,957 0 21 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5
24 1983 29–14 67.4% #8 1,903 0 25 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9
25 1984 13–10 56.5% #33 1,827 0 25 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11
26 1985 23–13 63.9% #28 1,832 0 25 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13
27 — — — — — — — 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15
28 — — — — — — — 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16
29 — — — — — — — 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17
30 1989 1–4 20.0% #514 1,738 0 25 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17
31 — — — — — — — 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17
32 — — — — — — — 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17
33 — — — — — — — 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jose Luis Clerc Roscoe Tanner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1978 2 1 3 66.7% 47 13 60 78.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1979 15 3 18 83.3% 31 14 45 68.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 47 7 54 87.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5%
22 1981 7 2 9 77.8% 44 5 49 89.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 57 11 68 83.8% — — — — 7 9 16 43.8% 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4%
24 1983 5 1 6 83.3% 24 9 33 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0%
25 1984 2 2 4 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0%
26 1985 1 2 3 33.3% 22 11 33 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4%
30 1989 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 42 18 60 70.0% 284 83 367 77.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 18 27 45 40.0% — 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jose Luis Clerc Roscoe Tanner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1479 102.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.17
18 1977 1488 104.9 — — — — +58 — — 40.0% -0.10 0–2 — — +0.53 1970 1417 113.2 — — — — +103 +73 — 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.50
19 1978 1862 154.7 — — — — -272 +118 -369 69.4% +1.32 9–2 (82%) 5–1 (83%) — +2.11 1971 1706 127.5 — — — — -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.17
20 1979 1931 152.6 — — — — -134 +53 -305 66.3% +1.18 12–8 (60%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.45 1972 1910 135.7 — — — — -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.27
21 1980 2016 159.7 — — — — -176 +145 -322 69.7% +1.31 16–8 (67%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.07 1973 1838 144.5 — — — — +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) — -3.40
22 1981 2071 165.6 — — — — -211 +222 -366 73.3% +1.59 13–4 (76%) 11–8 (58%) — -2.26 1974 1963 154.0 — — — — -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.27
23 1982 1957 162.1 — — — — -187 +262 — 68.8% +1.41 17–9 (65%) 12–7 (63%) — -1.60 1975 1972 153.3 — — — — +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.74
24 1983 1904 155.8 — — — — -155 +213 — 65.6% +1.19 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.11 1976 2018 159.4 — — — — +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) — -2.11
25 1984 1828 140.7 — — — — -86 +138 — 58.8% +0.76 0–2 3–3 (50%) — -0.10 1977 1890 153.2 — — — — -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.49
26 1985 1832 146.7 — — — — -119 +94 — 64.2% +0.80 3–3 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.21 1978 1941 160.3 — — — — +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) — -1.59
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2032 164.1 — — — — +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) — -3.91
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1997 154.8 — — — — +23 — +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) — -1.79
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1926 156.1 — — — — +117 — +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) — -0.51
30 1989 1739 102.4 — — — — — +88 — 30.8% -1.69 0–1 0–1 — +0.23 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +4 — +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) — -2.07
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1874 146.4 — — — — -44 — +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) — -4.29
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1681 120.1 — — — — -28 — — 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.69
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1662 99.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.08
Career — 2220 161.4 — — — — -162 +162 -333 67.6% +1.24 74–42 (64%) 61–45 (58%) 105.1 -0.83 — 2162 157.4 — — — — +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.