H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Josef Cihak vs Massimiliano Narducci H2H: 1-0

Josef Cihak holds a 1–0 lead over Massimiliano Narducci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Josef Cihak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Josef Cihak won the 1988 Munich Open round of 64 6-3 7-6.

CZE Age 63 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
ITA Age 62 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Josef Cihak #102 6-3 7-6 Massimiliano Narducci #122 Match data May 4, 1988* R64 Munich Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Josef Cihak #1,102 #72 116 1,589 18 28 39.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Massimiliano Narducci #461 #77 85 1,632 18 25 41.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Josef Cihak Massimiliano Narducci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1984 1–2 33.3% #207 1,494 0 0 1985 2–2 50.0% #263 1,527 0 0
22 1985 0–2 0.0% #240 1,483 0 0
23 1987 1–1 50.0% #138 1,540 0 0
24 1987 5–3 62.5% #77 1,564 0 0 1988 12–16 42.9% #205 1,571 0 1
25 1988 4–9 30.8% #175 1,522 0 0 1989 3–6 33.3% #266 1,561 0 1
26 1989 8–12 40.0% #246 1,507 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Josef Cihak Massimiliano Narducci
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1984 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1985 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1987 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1987 5 3 8 62.5% 1988 1 2 3 33.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1988 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1989 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 2 1 3 66.7% 16 23 39 41.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 18 34 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Josef Cihak Massimiliano Narducci
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1984 1495 101.2 +34 42.9% -1.29 0–1 3–1 (75%) +0.40 1985 1527 115.0 +20 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–1 +0.09
22 1985 1483 110.3 0.0% -3.75 -0.23
23 1987 1541 110.6 50.0% 0.00 -0.06
24 1987 1565 125.2 +36 58.8% +0.65 1–0 2–1 (67%) +0.23 1988 1572 123.4 -61 +73 -46 44.1% -0.50 5–1 (83%) 3–2 (60%) +0.88
25 1988 1523 109.3 +61 32.3% -0.97 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.66 1989 1561 115.5 +59 33.3% -0.76 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) +0.10
26 1989 1507 119.7 +17 +32 48.1% -0.15 3–7 (30%) 3–3 (50%) +1.36
Career 1589 121.1 +17 +41 43.2% -0.46 5–10 (33%) 9–6 (60%) 99.4 +5.26 1632 124.0 -61 +63 -46 43.1% -0.48 7–3 (70%) 5–5 (50%) 106.4 +2.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.