H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Juan Aguilera vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-0
Juan Aguilera holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Aguilera leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Aguilera won the 1990 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 1990* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Juan Aguilera | 6-1 6-3 | Diego Nargiso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Aguilera | #1,118 | #7 | 1,100 | 1,930 | 139 | 131 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Diego Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Aguilera | Diego Nargiso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #225 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #64 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #255 | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #166 | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #64 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,770 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1991 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #295 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |