H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Juan Aguilera vs Jaime Oncins H2H: 1-0
Juan Aguilera holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Oncins in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Aguilera leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Aguilera won the 1991 Miami Masters second round 6-3 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1991* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Juan Aguilera | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Aguilera | #1,118 | #7 | 1,100 | 1,930 | 139 | 131 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,796 | 61 | 86 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Aguilera | Jaime Oncins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #225 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #64 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1985 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #255 | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1987 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #166 | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1989 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #64 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,436 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,770 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1991 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #295 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,435 | 0 | 2 |