H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Juan Aguilera vs M. Edmondson H2H: 1-0
Juan Aguilera holds a 1–0 lead over M. Edmondson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Aguilera leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Aguilera won the 1984 Indianapolis third round 2-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1984 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Juan Aguilera | 2-6 6-2 7-5 | M. Edmondson | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Aguilera | #1,118 | #7 | 1,100 | 1,930 | 139 | 131 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| M. Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Aguilera | M. Edmondson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #225 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #64 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 |
| 23 | 1985 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #255 | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | 1987 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #166 | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | 1989 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #64 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,770 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 |
| 29 | 1991 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #295 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 |