H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Aguilera vs Paolo Cane H2H: 1-1
Juan Aguilera and Paolo Cane are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paolo Cane leads 1–0 on carpet, while Juan Aguilera leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Aguilera won the 1990 Estoril fourth round 6-2 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1990* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Juan Aguilera | 6-2 6-7 6-4 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
| Feb 16, 1990* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Paolo Cane | 6-3 6-7 6-4 | Juan Aguilera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Aguilera | #1,118 | #7 | 1,100 | 1,930 | 139 | 131 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Aguilera | Paolo Cane | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #225 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #64 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1985 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1986 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #255 | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1987 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #166 | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1989 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #64 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,770 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1991 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #295 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |