H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Juan Aguilera vs Tomas Smid H2H: 0-2
Tomas Smid holds a 2–0 lead over Juan Aguilera in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1985 Geneva semifinal 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 1985* | Geneva | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Tomas Smid | 7-5 6-4 | Juan Aguilera | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1983* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-3 7-6 | Juan Aguilera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Aguilera | #1,118 | #7 | 1,100 | 1,930 | 139 | 131 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Aguilera | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #225 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #64 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1985 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #255 | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1987 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #166 | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1989 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #64 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,770 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1991 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #295 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |