H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 19:16 UTC
Juan Antonio Marin vs D. Nargiso H2H: 0-1
D. Nargiso holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Antonio Marin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, D. Nargiso leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, D. Nargiso won the 2000 San Marino fourth round 7-5 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRC
Age 51
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2000* | San Marino | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | D. Nargiso | 7-5 2-6 6-4 | Juan Antonio Marin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Antonio Marin | #1,145 | #55 | 809 | 1,658 | 75 | 118 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| D. Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Antonio Marin | D. Nargiso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #87 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #70 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #70 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #120 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #130 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2006 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,447 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1127 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |