H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-1
Juan Carlos Ferrero holds a 2–1 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 2–0 on clay, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Carlos Ferrero won the 2002 Estoril third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2002* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Juan Carlos Ferrero | 7-5 6-2 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2002* | Marseille | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 6-7(3) 6-4 7-5 | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Match data |
| Jul 14, 2001* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Juan Carlos Ferrero | 6-2 6-1 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Carlos Ferrero | #968 | #1 | 4,570 | 2,096 | 457 | 254 | 64.3% | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 16 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1999 | 16–8 | 66.7% | #42 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #4 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #3 | 2,005 | 1 | 11 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #31 | 1,751 | 1 | 11 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,841 | 1 | 11 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,740 | 1 | 11 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,833 | 1 | 11 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2008 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #55 | 1,845 | 1 | 11 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2009 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,924 | 1 | 12 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2010 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #29 | 1,887 | 1 | 15 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2011 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #50 | 1,924 | 1 | 16 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,794 | 1 | 16 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 |