H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 1-1
Juan Carlos Ferrero and Ernests Gulbis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 1–0 on clay, while Ernests Gulbis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2011 Canada Masters second round 3-6 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2011* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ernests Gulbis | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2007* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Juan Carlos Ferrero | 6-3 6-1 | Ernests Gulbis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Carlos Ferrero | #968 | #1 | 4,570 | 2,096 | 457 | 254 | 64.3% | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 16 |
| Ernests Gulbis | #893 | #10 | 2,725 | 2,139 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Ernests Gulbis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #141 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 16–8 | 66.7% | #42 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #90 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #24 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2002 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #4 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2003 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #3 | 2,005 | 1 | 11 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2004 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #31 | 1,751 | 1 | 11 | 2013 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #24 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,841 | 1 | 11 | 2014 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2006 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,740 | 1 | 11 | 2015 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #81 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2007 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,833 | 1 | 11 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2008 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #55 | 1,845 | 1 | 11 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,716 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2009 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,924 | 1 | 12 | 2018 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #95 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2010 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #29 | 1,887 | 1 | 15 | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #226 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2011 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #50 | 1,924 | 1 | 16 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,562 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,794 | 1 | 16 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 6 |