H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-0

Juan Carlos Ferrero holds a 1–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Carlos Ferrero won the 2004 China Open round of 32 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Carlos Ferrero
ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Juan Carlos Ferrero #11 6-4 6-1 Justin Gimelstob #256 Match data Sep 16, 2004* R32 China Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Juan Carlos Ferrero #968 #1 4,570 2,096 461 256 64.3% 1 4 0 2 9 16
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Carlos Ferrero Justin Gimelstob
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0
19 1999 16–8 66.7% #42 1,686 0 1 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0
20 2000 41–26 61.2% #12 1,800 0 1 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0
21 2001 56–20 73.7% #5 1,878 0 5 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0
22 2002 47–24 66.2% #4 1,918 0 7 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0
23 2003 63–18 77.8% #3 2,006 1 11 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0
24 2004 20–16 55.6% #31 1,746 1 11 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0
25 2005 45–26 63.4% #17 1,842 1 11 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0
26 2006 28–23 54.9% #23 1,741 1 11 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0
27 2007 34–23 59.6% #24 1,833 1 11 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0
28 2008 21–15 58.3% #55 1,850 1 11 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0
29 2009 33–20 62.3% #23 1,927 1 12 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0
30 2010 33–14 70.2% #29 1,887 1 15 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0
31 2011 20–11 64.5% #50 1,925 1 16 — — — — — — —
32 2012 4–12 25.0% #213 1,795 1 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Juan Carlos Ferrero Justin Gimelstob
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 2000 20 16 36 55.6% 18 7 25 72.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 33 5 38 86.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2002 22 13 35 62.9% 20 7 27 74.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2003 30 12 42 71.4% 29 4 33 87.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
24 2004 13 10 23 56.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2005 18 13 31 58.1% 20 9 29 69.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2006 10 11 21 47.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2007 10 10 20 50.0% 20 11 31 64.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2008 14 9 23 60.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2009 9 11 20 45.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
30 2010 5 5 10 50.0% 28 7 35 80.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2011 9 7 16 56.3% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 178 134 312 57.1% 236 92 328 72.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 17 13 30 56.7% — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 472/479 of Juan Carlos Ferrero's and 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Juan Carlos Ferrero Justin Gimelstob
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7%
23 2003 76/81 5.4 2.9 60.1% 72.9% 55.4% 58.7% 44.8% 66.0% 41.7% 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6%
24 2004 34/36 5.8 2.6 61.9% 70.6% 55.2% 63.8% 31.0% 64.6% 36.3% 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1%
25 2005 71/71 3.1 1.7 66.6% 68.7% 55.4% 64.7% 40.0% 64.0% 40.1% 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0%
26 2006 51/51 4.2 1.4 68.8% 68.4% 52.3% 53.7% 37.6% 63.6% 38.8% 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5%
27 2007 57/57 4.0 1.7 68.0% 68.0% 54.2% 60.3% 40.0% 63.3% 39.9% 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9%
28 2008 36/36 4.3 1.4 66.4% 71.2% 54.4% 64.8% 48.1% 65.5% 37.4% 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8%
29 2009 53/53 4.3 1.6 66.8% 67.7% 54.2% 56.6% 45.3% 62.9% 38.6% 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9%
30 2010 47/47 2.2 1.1 71.6% 69.1% 59.1% 49.7% 47.4% 65.8% 43.0% 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5%
31 2011 31/31 2.9 1.9 63.2% 66.8% 56.8% 60.9% 40.0% 63.0% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 16/16 2.6 1.4 66.7% 64.6% 48.7% 50.6% 24.4% 59.3% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 472/717 4.0 1.8 65.9% 69.3% 54.9% 58.8% 41.3% 64.2% 39.7% — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.6% 38.2% 61.5% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Juan Carlos Ferrero Justin Gimelstob
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — — -0.13
19 1999 1686 142.0 — — — — -138 +89 — 60.0% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 6–3 (67%) 111.1 +0.07 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.63
20 2000 1800 148.8 — — — — -64 +139 — 55.4% +0.23 17–7 (71%) 16–18 (47%) 106.6 -2.52 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) 103.8 +0.60
21 2001 1878 157.3 — — — — -95 +220 -268 67.7% +1.22 15–11 (58%) 20–16 (56%) 103.4 +0.58 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) 96.0 -0.12
22 2002 1918 154.2 — — — — -41 +161 — 58.9% +0.57 19–9 (68%) 17–13 (57%) 104.6 -0.82 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) 91.8 -1.22
23 2003 2007 158.9 +3.93 +4.21 1.225 53.4% -30 +145 -298 70.9% +1.30 15–4 (79%) 18–13 (58%) 105.5 +0.35 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 +0.17
24 2004 1747 128.6 +1.06 -0.36 1.027 50.3% +51 +269 -36 56.0% +0.22 5–6 (45%) 15–9 (63%) 94.2 +1.57 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.32
25 2005 1842 151.4 +2.55 +2.95 1.115 51.9% -52 +143 -11 58.6% +0.45 14–10 (58%) 17–12 (59%) 103.5 -2.96 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.03
26 2006 1742 138.7 +1.38 +1.19 1.068 50.9% -15 +121 +98 53.7% +0.29 10–10 (50%) 11–7 (61%) 97.2 +2.03 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 95.7 +1.70
27 2007 1833 151.3 +0.46 +2.46 1.089 51.4% -51 +18 +67 56.8% +0.36 11–8 (58%) 14–10 (58%) 103.6 +2.65 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42
28 2008 1850 156.7 +2.12 +1.77 1.085 51.3% +31 -4 — 61.0% +0.67 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 97.5 -1.14 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 -0.05
29 2009 1928 151.7 +0.61 +1.78 1.042 50.7% -70 -4 +108 56.9% +0.38 10–5 (67%) 10–10 (50%) 102.6 -3.54 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 100.7 +0.54
30 2010 1887 151.5 +2.13 +4.36 1.258 53.9% -65 +143 — 64.9% +1.12 9–7 (56%) 7–7 (50%) 98.1 +3.73 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
31 2011 1926 148.5 +0.68 +2.08 1.083 51.3% -48 +104 — 56.6% +0.30 8–4 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 108.2 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 1795 134.7 -1.29 +0.49 0.883 47.1% +21 +87 — 33.3% -1.19 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 93.7 -1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2096 156.9 +1.74 +2.44 1.109 51.7% -39 +122 -3 59.8% +0.60 145–91 (61%) 165–130 (56%) 106.0 -0.14 — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) 92.8 +0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.