H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 3-5

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 5–3 lead over Juan Carlos Ferrero in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Carlos Ferrero won the 2009 Canada Masters second round 6-1 6-4.

ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 2009* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Juan Carlos Ferrero #29 6-1 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #40 Match data
Aug 7, 2007* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #21 7-6(5) 6-4 Juan Carlos Ferrero #17 Match data
Feb 22, 2004* Rotterdam ATP 250 F Hard Lleyton Hewitt #13 6-7(1) 7-5 6-4 Juan Carlos Ferrero #3 Match data
Sep 5, 2003* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Juan Carlos Ferrero #3 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) 6-1 Lleyton Hewitt #6 Match data
Nov 19, 2002* Masters Cup ATP Finals F Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 7-5 7-5 2-6 2-6 6-4 Juan Carlos Ferrero #4 Match data
Nov 19, 2001* Masters Cup ATP Finals SF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-4 6-3 Juan Carlos Ferrero #5 Match data
Jun 8, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Juan Carlos Ferrero #4 6-4 6-2 6-1 Lleyton Hewitt #6 Match data
Mar 11, 2000* Scottsdale ATP 250 SF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #18 6-4 6-2 Juan Carlos Ferrero #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Juan Carlos Ferrero #968 #1 4,570 2,096 457 254 64.3% 1 4 0 0 11 16
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Carlos Ferrero Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 1999 16–8 66.7% #42 1,686 0 1 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 2000 38–25 60.3% #12 1,802 0 1 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2001 56–20 73.7% #5 1,878 0 5 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2002 47–24 66.2% #4 1,918 0 7 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2003 63–18 77.8% #3 2,005 1 11 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2004 19–15 55.9% #31 1,751 1 11 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2005 45–26 63.4% #17 1,841 1 11 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2006 28–23 54.9% #23 1,740 1 11 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2007 34–23 59.6% #24 1,833 1 11 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2008 21–15 58.3% #55 1,845 1 11 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2009 33–20 62.3% #23 1,924 1 12 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2010 33–14 70.2% #29 1,887 1 15 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2011 20–11 64.5% #50 1,924 1 16 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2012 4–12 25.0% #213 1,794 1 16 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30