H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Mario Ancic H2H: 3-0
Juan Carlos Ferrero holds a 3–0 lead over Mario Ancic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Carlos Ferrero won the 2008 Indian Wells Masters third round 7-5 4-6 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2008* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Juan Carlos Ferrero | 7-5 4-6 7-6(7) | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2004* | Valencia | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Juan Carlos Ferrero | 6-4 6-4 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Juan Carlos Ferrero | 6-0 6-3 6-2 | Mario Ancic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Carlos Ferrero | #968 | #1 | 4,570 | 2,096 | 457 | 254 | 64.3% | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 16 |
| Mario Ancic | #475 | #7 | 2,075 | 2,019 | 193 | 124 | 60.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Mario Ancic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #89 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 16–8 | 66.7% | #42 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2002 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #4 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #9 | 1,954 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2003 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #3 | 2,005 | 1 | 11 | 2007 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #83 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2004 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #31 | 1,751 | 1 | 11 | 2008 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #36 | 1,903 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,841 | 1 | 11 | 2009 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #95 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2006 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,740 | 1 | 11 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #478 | 1,866 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2007 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,833 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #55 | 1,845 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,924 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #29 | 1,887 | 1 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #50 | 1,924 | 1 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,794 | 1 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |