H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 4-1

Juan Carlos Ferrero holds a 4–1 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Carlos Ferrero won the 2011 Shanghai Masters second round 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Carlos Ferrero
ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 11, 2011* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Juan Carlos Ferrero #69 7-6(4) 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #34 Match data
Jul 15, 2011* Stuttgart ATP 250 R16 Clay Juan Carlos Ferrero #85 6-7(6) 6-2 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #17 Match data
Jun 24, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Juan Carlos Ferrero #70 6-3 7-6(3) 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #44 Match data
Jun 3, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Mikhail Youzhny #15 6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-2 6-2 Juan Carlos Ferrero #20 Match data
Jan 10, 2003* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Juan Carlos Ferrero #4 6-3 6-2 Mikhail Youzhny #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Juan Carlos Ferrero #968 #1 4,570 2,096 457 254 64.3% 1 4 0 0 11 16
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Carlos Ferrero Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 1999 16–8 66.7% #42 1,686 0 1 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2000 38–25 60.3% #12 1,802 0 1 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 2001 56–20 73.7% #5 1,878 0 5 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2002 47–24 66.2% #4 1,918 0 7 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2003 63–18 77.8% #3 2,005 1 11 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2004 19–15 55.9% #31 1,751 1 11 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2005 45–26 63.4% #17 1,841 1 11 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2006 28–23 54.9% #23 1,740 1 11 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2007 34–23 59.6% #24 1,833 1 11 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2008 21–15 58.3% #55 1,845 1 11 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2009 33–20 62.3% #23 1,924 1 12 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2010 33–14 70.2% #29 1,887 1 15 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2011 20–11 64.5% #50 1,924 1 16 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 2012 4–12 25.0% #213 1,794 1 16 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10