H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 2-3

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 3–2 lead over Juan Carlos Ferrero in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 3–1 on clay, while Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2009 Umag final 6-3 6-0.

ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 2, 2009* Umag ATP 250 F Clay Nikolay Davydenko #9 6-3 6-0 Juan Carlos Ferrero #36 Match data
May 7, 2009* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #11 7-5 6-2 Juan Carlos Ferrero #92 Match data
May 14, 2005* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #20 3-6 6-2 6-1 Juan Carlos Ferrero #39 Match data
Apr 23, 2005* Barcelona ATP 250 SF Clay Juan Carlos Ferrero #58 7-6(1) 6-1 Nikolay Davydenko #16 Match data
Aug 13, 2003* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Juan Carlos Ferrero #3 6-0 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Juan Carlos Ferrero #968 #1 4,570 2,096 457 254 64.3% 1 4 0 0 11 16
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Carlos Ferrero Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1999 16–8 66.7% #42 1,686 0 1 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2000 38–25 60.3% #12 1,802 0 1 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2001 56–20 73.7% #5 1,878 0 5 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2002 47–24 66.2% #4 1,918 0 7 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2003 63–18 77.8% #3 2,005 1 11 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2004 19–15 55.9% #31 1,751 1 11 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2005 45–26 63.4% #17 1,841 1 11 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2006 28–23 54.9% #23 1,740 1 11 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2007 34–23 59.6% #24 1,833 1 11 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2008 21–15 58.3% #55 1,845 1 11 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2009 33–20 62.3% #23 1,924 1 12 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2010 33–14 70.2% #29 1,887 1 15 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2011 20–11 64.5% #50 1,924 1 16 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2012 4–12 25.0% #213 1,794 1 16 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21