H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 1-3
Radek Stepanek holds a 3–1 lead over Juan Carlos Ferrero in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2009 Shanghai Masters second round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2009* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Radek Stepanek | 6-3 6-0 | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Match data |
| Jul 2, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Radek Stepanek | 5-7 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 11-9 | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2005* | Vienna | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Juan Carlos Ferrero | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2005* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Radek Stepanek | 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Carlos Ferrero | #968 | #1 | 4,570 | 2,096 | 457 | 254 | 64.3% | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 16 |
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Radek Stepanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1999 | 16–8 | 66.7% | #42 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #4 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #3 | 2,005 | 1 | 11 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #31 | 1,751 | 1 | 11 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,841 | 1 | 11 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,740 | 1 | 11 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,833 | 1 | 11 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2008 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #55 | 1,845 | 1 | 11 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2009 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,924 | 1 | 12 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2010 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #29 | 1,887 | 1 | 15 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2011 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #50 | 1,924 | 1 | 16 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,794 | 1 | 16 | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 |