H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Sjeng Schalken H2H: 1-0
Juan Carlos Ferrero holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Carlos Ferrero won the 2001 Rome Masters second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2001* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Juan Carlos Ferrero | 6-3 7-5 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Carlos Ferrero | #968 | #1 | 4,570 | 2,096 | 457 | 254 | 64.3% | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 16 |
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Sjeng Schalken | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1999 | 16–8 | 66.7% | #42 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2000 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2001 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2002 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #4 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2003 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #3 | 2,005 | 1 | 11 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2004 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #31 | 1,751 | 1 | 11 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,841 | 1 | 11 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2006 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,740 | 1 | 11 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2007 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,833 | 1 | 11 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2008 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #55 | 1,845 | 1 | 11 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2009 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,924 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #29 | 1,887 | 1 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #50 | 1,924 | 1 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,794 | 1 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |