H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Tim Henman H2H: 2-1
Juan Carlos Ferrero holds a 2–1 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 2–0 on clay, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Juan Carlos Ferrero won the 2007 Monte Carlo Masters second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2007* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Juan Carlos Ferrero | 7-5 6-2 | Tim Henman | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Juan Carlos Ferrero | 4-6 6-2 6-4 6-2 | Tim Henman | Match data |
| Nov 4, 1999* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Tim Henman | 4-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Carlos Ferrero | #968 | #1 | 4,570 | 2,096 | 457 | 254 | 64.3% | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 16 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Carlos Ferrero | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1999 | 16–8 | 66.7% | #42 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #4 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2003 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #3 | 2,005 | 1 | 11 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2004 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #31 | 1,751 | 1 | 11 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,841 | 1 | 11 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2006 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,740 | 1 | 11 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2007 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,833 | 1 | 11 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2008 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #55 | 1,845 | 1 | 11 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2009 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,924 | 1 | 12 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2010 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #29 | 1,887 | 1 | 15 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2011 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #50 | 1,924 | 1 | 16 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,794 | 1 | 16 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 |