H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Juan Carlos Ferrero vs Tommy Haas H2H: 3-2

Juan Carlos Ferrero holds a 3–2 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Juan Carlos Ferrero leads 3–0 on clay, while Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2009 Washington fourth round 7-5 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Carlos Ferrero
ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 2009* Washington ATP 500 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #23 7-5 2-6 6-1 Juan Carlos Ferrero #29 Match data
Jun 11, 2005* Halle ATP 250 QF Grass Tommy Haas #23 6-2 7-5 Juan Carlos Ferrero #34 Match data
May 26, 2004* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Juan Carlos Ferrero #4 3-6 6-4 6-4 6-2 Tommy Haas #115 Match data
Apr 21, 2002* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Juan Carlos Ferrero #4 6-3 6-1 Tommy Haas #7 Match data
Jul 29, 1999* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R32 Clay Juan Carlos Ferrero #76 3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 Tommy Haas #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Juan Carlos Ferrero #968 #1 4,570 2,096 457 254 64.3% 1 4 0 0 11 16
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Carlos Ferrero Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 1999 16–8 66.7% #42 1,686 0 1 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2000 38–25 60.3% #12 1,802 0 1 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2001 56–20 73.7% #5 1,878 0 5 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2002 47–24 66.2% #4 1,918 0 7 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2003 63–18 77.8% #3 2,005 1 11 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2004 19–15 55.9% #31 1,751 1 11 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2005 45–26 63.4% #17 1,841 1 11 — — — — — — —
26 2006 28–23 54.9% #23 1,740 1 11 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2007 34–23 59.6% #24 1,833 1 11 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2008 21–15 58.3% #55 1,845 1 11 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2009 33–20 62.3% #23 1,924 1 12 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2010 33–14 70.2% #29 1,887 1 15 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2011 20–11 64.5% #50 1,924 1 16 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2012 4–12 25.0% #213 1,794 1 16 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15