H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Juan Ignacio Chela vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 1-0
Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 1–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2002 Tokyo third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2002* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-1 6-0 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Ignacio Chela | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |